Mirato vs Risk Ledger
Mirato vs Risk Ledger, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mirato is on 55/100 and Risk Ledger on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Mirato
- agent readiness: 56/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 55/100
Risk Ledger
- our overall score: 58/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 91 against 15
- funding raised: $32.0M against $9.0M
- LinkedIn following: 6,713 against 4,376
At a glance
| Measure | Mirato | Risk Ledger |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Third-party risk management intelligence platform using AI and NLP to validate and enrich data. | Automates third-party risk management for enterprises through continuous monitoring and data intelligence. |
| Category | Fintech, Third-Party Risk Management (TPRM), Risk Analytics, Risk Management | Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Third-Party Risk Management, Supply Chain Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | Not published |
| Headquarters | New York, United States | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mirato | Risk Ledger |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15 | 91 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -14.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $9.0M | $32.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,376 | 6,713 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mirato | Risk Ledger |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 47/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 31/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (56/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mirato | Risk Ledger |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
Mirato vs Risk Ledger: common questions
Which is better, Mirato or Risk Ledger?
On our 0-100 score Risk Ledger rates higher (58/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mirato and Risk Ledger compare on the numbers?
Mirato leads on agent readiness (56/100 against 38/100), domain rating (62/100 against 55/100). Risk Ledger leads on our overall score (58/100 against 55/100), headcount (91 against 15), funding raised ($32.0M against $9.0M), LinkedIn following (6,713 against 4,376).
Read the full Mirato review and pricing or the Risk Ledger review and pricing. You can also browse other Mirato alternatives we track.