Mindfly vs Track160
Mindfly vs Track160, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mindfly is on 46/100 and Track160 on 52/100.
Where each one leads
Mindfly
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 21/100
- headcount growth: +62.3% against -29.6%
Track160
- our overall score: 52/100 against 46/100
- domain rating: 27/100 against 22/100
- headcount: 34 against 14
- funding raised: $5.0M against $1.3M
- LinkedIn following: 3,875 against 1,488
At a glance
| Measure | Mindfly | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered body cam and video platform for immersive sports fan experiences. | Automated FIFA EPTS certified football data analytics platform for clubs and leagues. |
| Category | Sports, Video Creation, Camera, Wearable | Sports, Analytics, Video, Data |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C, B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware, Software | Software |
| Founded | 2020 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mindfly | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 14 | 34 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +62.3% | -29.6% |
| Total funding | $1.3M | $5.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 1,488 | 3,875 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mindfly | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 46/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 42/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 36/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 48/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 22/100 | 27/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mindfly | Track160 |
|---|---|---|
| CMS | Wix | Not detected |
Mindfly vs Track160: common questions
Which is better, Mindfly or Track160?
On our 0-100 score Track160 rates higher (52/100 against 46/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mindfly and Track160 compare on the numbers?
Mindfly leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 21/100), headcount growth (+62.3% against -29.6%). Track160 leads on our overall score (52/100 against 46/100), domain rating (27/100 against 22/100), headcount (34 against 14), funding raised ($5.0M against $1.3M), LinkedIn following (3,875 against 1,488).
Read the full Mindfly review and pricing or the Track160 review and pricing. You can also browse other Mindfly alternatives we track.