Mimecast vs xorlab
Mimecast vs xorlab, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mimecast is on 55/100 and xorlab on 48/100.
Where each one leads
Mimecast
- our overall score: 55/100 against 48/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 32/100
- headcount: 2,441 against 27
- funding raised: $239M against $5.0M
xorlab
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Mimecast | xorlab |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global cybersecurity company specializing in email security and human risk management. | AI-powered email security for European organizations prioritizing data sovereignty, protecting against phishing and BEC attacks. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Email Security, Risk Management, Data Protection | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Email Security, Phishing Protection |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2003 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Zurich, Switzerland |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mimecast | xorlab |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,441 | 27 |
| Total funding | $239M | $5.0M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series A+ |
| Valuation | $1.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 2,676 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mimecast | xorlab |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 48/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 32/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mimecast | xorlab |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Mimecast vs xorlab: common questions
Which is better, Mimecast or xorlab?
On our 0-100 score Mimecast rates higher (55/100 against 48/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mimecast and xorlab compare on the numbers?
Mimecast leads on our overall score (55/100 against 48/100), domain rating (91/100 against 32/100), headcount (2,441 against 27), funding raised ($239M against $5.0M).
Read the full Mimecast review and pricing or the xorlab review and pricing. You can also browse other Mimecast alternatives we track.