Mimecast vs Risk Ledger
Mimecast vs Risk Ledger, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mimecast is on 55/100 and Risk Ledger on 58/100.
Where each one leads
Mimecast
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 38/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 55/100
- headcount: 2,441 against 91
- funding raised: $239M against $32.0M
Risk Ledger
- our overall score: 58/100 against 55/100
At a glance
| Measure | Mimecast | Risk Ledger |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global cybersecurity company specializing in email security and human risk management. | Automates third-party risk management for enterprises through continuous monitoring and data intelligence. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Email Security, Risk Management, Data Protection | Cybersecurity, Risk Management, Third-Party Risk Management, Supply Chain Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2003 | Not published |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mimecast | Risk Ledger |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,441 | 91 |
| Total funding | $239M | $32.0M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 6,713 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mimecast | Risk Ledger |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (38/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 55/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mimecast | Risk Ledger |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Mimecast vs Risk Ledger: common questions
Which is better, Mimecast or Risk Ledger?
On our 0-100 score Risk Ledger rates higher (58/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mimecast and Risk Ledger compare on the numbers?
Mimecast leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 38/100), domain rating (91/100 against 55/100), headcount (2,441 against 91), funding raised ($239M against $32.0M). Risk Ledger leads on our overall score (58/100 against 55/100).
Read the full Mimecast review and pricing or the Risk Ledger review and pricing. You can also browse other Mimecast alternatives we track.