Mimecast vs Phisharmor
Mimecast vs Phisharmor, compared side by side on 10 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mimecast is on 55/100 and Phisharmor on 7/100.
Where each one leads
Mimecast
- our overall score: 55/100 against 7/100
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 0/100
Phisharmor
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Mimecast | Phisharmor |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global cybersecurity company specializing in email security and human risk management. | Protect yourself with AI-powered phishing detection. Scan emails and webpages for scams. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Email Security, Risk Management, Data Protection | Cybersecurity, Threat Detection, Email Security, Web Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2003 | Not published |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mimecast | Phisharmor |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,441 | Not published |
| Total funding | $239M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series E | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.5B | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mimecast | Phisharmor |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 7/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | Not published |
| Quality | 65/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | F (36/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 0/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mimecast | Phisharmor |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
Mimecast vs Phisharmor: common questions
Which is better, Mimecast or Phisharmor?
On our 0-100 score Mimecast rates higher (55/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 10 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mimecast and Phisharmor compare on the numbers?
Mimecast leads on our overall score (55/100 against 7/100), agent readiness (48/100 against 36/100), domain rating (91/100 against 0/100).
Read the full Mimecast review and pricing or the Phisharmor review and pricing. You can also browse other Mimecast alternatives we track.