Mimecast vs Panaseer
Mimecast vs Panaseer, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mimecast is on 55/100 and Panaseer on 53/100.
Where each one leads
Mimecast
- domain rating: 91/100 against 59/100
- headcount: 2,441 against 91
- funding raised: $239M against $44.4M
Panaseer
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Mimecast | Panaseer |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global cybersecurity company specializing in email security and human risk management. | Panaseer provides a Continuous Controls Monitoring platform for enterprise security, offering automated insights into cybersecurity posture. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Email Security, Risk Management, Data Protection | Cybersecurity, Security Posture Management, Risk Management, Enterprise Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2003 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mimecast | Panaseer |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,441 | 91 |
| Total funding | $239M | $44.4M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 12,484 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mimecast | Panaseer |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 53/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 50/100 |
| Search visibility | 25/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (48/100) | D (46/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mimecast | Panaseer |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Azure | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity |
Mimecast vs Panaseer: common questions
Which is better, Mimecast or Panaseer?
On our 0-100 score Mimecast rates higher (55/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mimecast and Panaseer compare on the numbers?
Mimecast leads on domain rating (91/100 against 59/100), headcount (2,441 against 91), funding raised ($239M against $44.4M).
Read the full Mimecast review and pricing or the Panaseer review and pricing. You can also browse other Mimecast alternatives we track.