Microsoft vs OpenText
Microsoft vs OpenText, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Microsoft is on 39/100 and OpenText on 9/100.
Where each one leads
Microsoft
- our overall score: 39/100 against 9/100
- domain rating: 96/100 against 86/100
OpenText
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 45/100
At a glance
| Measure | Microsoft | OpenText |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A global technology leader providing software, cloud services, AI, and devices for individuals and businesses. | Enterprise information management software and services provider. |
| Category | Operating System, Productivity Software, Cloud Computing, AI Infrastructure | Enterprise Software, Information Management, Content Management, Business Process Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | hardware | services | platform | Software |
| Founded | 1975 | 1991 |
| Headquarters | Redmond, United States | Waterloo, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Microsoft | OpenText |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 230,602 | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 28,176,905 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Microsoft | OpenText |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 39/100 | 9/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | Not published |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | 33/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 70/100 | 5/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 96/100 | 86/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Microsoft | OpenText |
|---|---|---|
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Microsoft | OpenText |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 5 negative across 6 threads |
“OpenText is the worst company I’ve worked at. I joined during COVID right after finishing my Master’s from a top university. Role: Software Developer. I worked hard, got consistently good performance reviews, and delivered solid work. But e”r/waterloo
Microsoft vs OpenText: common questions
Which is better, Microsoft or OpenText?
On our 0-100 score Microsoft rates higher (39/100 against 9/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Microsoft and OpenText compare on the numbers?
Microsoft leads on our overall score (39/100 against 9/100), domain rating (96/100 against 86/100). OpenText leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 45/100).
What do real users say about Microsoft and OpenText?
OpenText: 0 positive and 5 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/waterloo.
Read the full Microsoft review and pricing or the OpenText review and pricing. You can also browse other Microsoft alternatives we track.