Method vs Shockwave Medical
Method vs Shockwave Medical, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Method is on 56/100 and Shockwave Medical on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Method
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 42/100
Shockwave Medical
- our overall score: 66/100 against 56/100
- funding raised: $200M against $20.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Method | Shockwave Medical |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops an AI-driven surgical navigation platform using 3D ultrasound for enhanced cancer treatment. | Develops intravascular lithotripsy technology for treating calcified cardiovascular lesions. |
| Category | MedTech, HealthTech, Surgical Robotics, AI-Driven Drug Discovery | MedTech, HealthTech, Medical Devices, Cardiovascular Devices |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware |
| Founded | 2021 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Santa Clara, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Method | Shockwave Medical |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 1,542 |
| Total funding | $20.0M | $200M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series D |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 120,592 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Method | Shockwave Medical |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 12/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (50/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | Not published | 59/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Method | Shockwave Medical |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
Method vs Shockwave Medical: common questions
Which is better, Method or Shockwave Medical?
On our 0-100 score Shockwave Medical rates higher (66/100 against 56/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Method and Shockwave Medical compare on the numbers?
Method leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 42/100). Shockwave Medical leads on our overall score (66/100 against 56/100), funding raised ($200M against $20.0M).
Read the full Method review and pricing or the Shockwave Medical review and pricing. You can also browse other Method alternatives we track.