Mercury vs Salmon
Mercury vs Salmon, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mercury is on 67/100 and Salmon on 40/100.
Where each one leads
Mercury
- our overall score: 67/100 against 40/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 31/100
- funding raised: $500M against $188M
Salmon
- headcount: 34,384 against 1,722
At a glance
| Measure | Mercury | Salmon |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Business banking. | Salmon is a fintech company providing a platform for managing and optimizing business finances. |
| Category | Fintech, Neobank, Payments, Embedded Finance | Fintech, Payments, Embedded Finance, Expense Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mercury | Salmon |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,722 | 34,384 |
| Total funding | $500M | $188M |
| Latest round | Series D | Undisclosed |
| Valuation | $5.2B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 1,083,501 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mercury | Salmon |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 40/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 13/100 |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 35/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | F (31/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mercury | Salmon |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Support stack | Zendesk | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Mercury vs Salmon: common questions
Which is better, Mercury or Salmon?
On our 0-100 score Mercury rates higher (67/100 against 40/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mercury and Salmon compare on the numbers?
Mercury leads on our overall score (67/100 against 40/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 31/100), funding raised ($500M against $188M). Salmon leads on headcount (34,384 against 1,722).
Read the full Mercury review and pricing or the Salmon review and pricing. You can also browse other Mercury alternatives we track.