Mercury vs Opal Payment
Mercury vs Opal Payment, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mercury is on 67/100 and Opal Payment on 44/100.
Where each one leads
Mercury
- our overall score: 67/100 against 44/100
- agent readiness: 52/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 78/100 against 13/100
- headcount: 1,722 against 15
- funding raised: $500M against $1.5M
Opal Payment
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Mercury | Opal Payment |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Business banking. | Opal automates media agency back-office operations, including contract, invoicing, and payment management. |
| Category | Fintech, Neobank, Payments, Embedded Finance | Fintech, Payments, Embedded Finance, AdTech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | platform | Software | platform |
| Founded | 2017 | 2024 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mercury | Opal Payment |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,722 | 15 |
| Total funding | $500M | $1.5M |
| Latest round | Series D | Pre-Seed |
| Valuation | $5.2B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 1,419 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mercury | Opal Payment |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 44/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 43/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 37/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (52/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 78/100 | 13/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mercury | Opal Payment |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
Mercury vs Opal Payment: common questions
Which is better, Mercury or Opal Payment?
On our 0-100 score Mercury rates higher (67/100 against 44/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mercury and Opal Payment compare on the numbers?
Mercury leads on our overall score (67/100 against 44/100), agent readiness (52/100 against 42/100), domain rating (78/100 against 13/100), headcount (1,722 against 15), funding raised ($500M against $1.5M).
Read the full Mercury review and pricing or the Opal Payment review and pricing. You can also browse other Mercury alternatives we track.