MeMed vs Senseera
MeMed vs Senseera, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: MeMed is on 61/100 and Senseera on 54/100.
Where each one leads
MeMed
- our overall score: 61/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 35/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 46/100 against 18/100
- headcount: 99 against 20
- funding raised: $196M against $7.1M
- LinkedIn following: 21,207 against 1,579
Senseera
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | MeMed | Senseera |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | MeMed develops and commercializes host immune response diagnostic solutions to address complex clinical dilemmas and improve patient outcomes. | Developing a liquid biopsy blood test for early disease detection and monitoring using epigenetic information. |
| Category | Healthcare, Blood, Diagnostics, MedTech | Healthcare, Blood, Diagnostics, Cancer |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tirat Carmel, Israel | San Diego, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | MeMed | Senseera |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 99 | 20 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -8.4% | Not published |
| Total funding | $196M | $7.1M |
| Latest round | Series E | Seed |
| LinkedIn followers | 21,207 | 1,579 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | MeMed | Senseera |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 47/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 29/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (35/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 18/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | MeMed | Senseera |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
MeMed vs Senseera: common questions
Which is better, MeMed or Senseera?
On our 0-100 score MeMed rates higher (61/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do MeMed and Senseera compare on the numbers?
MeMed leads on our overall score (61/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (35/100 against 21/100), domain rating (46/100 against 18/100), headcount (99 against 20), funding raised ($196M against $7.1M), LinkedIn following (21,207 against 1,579).
Read the full MeMed review and pricing or the Senseera review and pricing. You can also browse other MeMed alternatives we track.