Membrane Technology & Research vs Stormfisher
Membrane Technology & Research vs Stormfisher, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Membrane Technology & Research is on 51/100 and Stormfisher on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Membrane Technology & Research
- agent readiness: 45/100 against 33/100
Stormfisher
- our overall score: 62/100 against 51/100
- domain rating: 34/100 against 28/100
- funding raised: $430M against $27.0M
At a glance
| Measure | Membrane Technology & Research | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Membrane technology for carbon capture, hydrogen, and natural gas. | Develops, owns, and operates industrial-scale facilities producing green hydrogen derived e-Fuels. |
| Category | Climate Tech, Carbon Capture, Membrane Technology, Clean Energy | Climate Tech, Clean Energy, Green Hydrogen, Hydrogen |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Services |
| Founded | 1986 | 2006 |
| Headquarters | Newark, USA | London, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Membrane Technology & Research | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 53 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +46.9% |
| Total funding | $27.0M | $430M |
| Latest round | Series B | PE Round |
| Valuation | $1.1B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 9,514 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Membrane Technology & Research | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 51/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 37/100 | 57/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 13/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 28/100 | 34/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Membrane Technology & Research | Stormfisher |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
Membrane Technology & Research vs Stormfisher: common questions
Which is better, Membrane Technology & Research or Stormfisher?
On our 0-100 score Stormfisher rates higher (62/100 against 51/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Membrane Technology & Research and Stormfisher compare on the numbers?
Membrane Technology & Research leads on agent readiness (45/100 against 33/100). Stormfisher leads on our overall score (62/100 against 51/100), domain rating (34/100 against 28/100), funding raised ($430M against $27.0M).
Read the full Membrane Technology & Research review and pricing or the Stormfisher review and pricing. You can also browse other Membrane Technology & Research alternatives we track.