mediQ vs NeuroPace
mediQ vs NeuroPace, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: mediQ is on 54/100 and NeuroPace on 67/100.
Where each one leads
mediQ
- headcount: 1,372 against 248
NeuroPace
- our overall score: 67/100 against 54/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 41/100
- domain rating: 53/100 against 38/100
- funding raised: $475M against $7.8M
At a glance
| Measure | mediQ | NeuroPace |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global healthcare and homecare partner providing medical devices, products, and innovative solutions. | Develops a brain-computer interface for treating epilepsy. |
| Category | MedTech, HealthTech, Medical Devices, Homecare | MedTech, HealthTech, Brain-Computer Interface, Non-Invasive BCI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2020 | 1997 |
| Headquarters | Utrecht, Netherlands | Mountain View, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | mediQ | NeuroPace |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 1,372 | 248 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -11.1% | Not published |
| Total funding | $7.8M | $475M |
| Latest round | Series A | IPO |
| Valuation | Not published | $375M |
| LinkedIn followers | 30,743 | 32,261 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | mediQ | NeuroPace |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 54/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 54/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 38/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | mediQ | NeuroPace |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Jquery |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
mediQ vs NeuroPace: common questions
Which is better, mediQ or NeuroPace?
On our 0-100 score NeuroPace rates higher (67/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do mediQ and NeuroPace compare on the numbers?
mediQ leads on headcount (1,372 against 248). NeuroPace leads on our overall score (67/100 against 54/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 41/100), domain rating (53/100 against 38/100), funding raised ($475M against $7.8M).
Read the full mediQ review and pricing or the NeuroPace review and pricing. You can also browse other mediQ alternatives we track.