McKesson Europe vs PHIL
McKesson Europe vs PHIL, compared side by side on 10 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: McKesson Europe is on 7/100 and PHIL on 64/100.
Where each one leads
McKesson Europe
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
PHIL
- our overall score: 64/100 against 7/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 44/100 against 14/100
At a glance
| Measure | McKesson Europe | PHIL |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | McKesson Europe AG, with its headquarters in Stuttgart, Germany, is a leading international wholesale and retail company and provider of logistics and services | Enabling pharmaceutical companies to deliver medications directly to patients at scale. |
| Category | Healthcare, Pharmaceuticals, Logistics, Wholesale | HealthTech, Pharmaceuticals, Logistics, Fintech |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Stuttgart, Germany | Scottsdale, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | McKesson Europe | PHIL |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 279 |
| Total funding | Not published | $103M |
| Latest round | Not published | Growth Debt |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 30,316 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | McKesson Europe | PHIL |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 7/100 | 64/100 |
| Team | Not published | 100/100 |
| Search visibility | 11/100 | 81/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 14/100 | 44/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | McKesson Europe | PHIL |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Netlify |
| CDN | Not detected | Netlify |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
McKesson Europe vs PHIL: common questions
Which is better, McKesson Europe or PHIL?
On our 0-100 score PHIL rates higher (64/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 10 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do McKesson Europe and PHIL compare on the numbers?
PHIL leads on our overall score (64/100 against 7/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 22/100), domain rating (44/100 against 14/100).
Read the full McKesson Europe review and pricing or the PHIL review and pricing. You can also browse other McKesson Europe alternatives we track.