Maze vs User Testing
Maze vs User Testing, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Maze is on 61/100 and User Testing on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Maze
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
User Testing
- headcount: 1,846 against 164
- LinkedIn following: 183,294 against 41,077
At a glance
| Measure | Maze | User Testing |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | User research and testing platform for product teams to validate designs with real users. | Human insight platform for understanding user experience and product feedback. |
| Category | Product Management Tools, User Research, UX Design, Customer Feedback | Customer Experience, User Research, Product Management, UX Research |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2007 |
| Headquarters | Paris, France | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Maze | User Testing |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 164 | 1,846 |
| Total funding | $92.8M | $76.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | 41,077 | 183,294 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Maze | User Testing |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 90/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 23/100 |
| Quality | 65/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 79/100 | 84/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Maze | User Testing |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | CloudFront | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Payments | Apple PAY | Not detected |
| Analytics | Segment, Facebook Pixel | Google Tag Manager |
Maze vs User Testing: common questions
Which is better, Maze or User Testing?
On our 0-100 score User Testing rates higher (62/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Maze and User Testing compare on the numbers?
User Testing leads on headcount (1,846 against 164), LinkedIn following (183,294 against 41,077).
Read the full Maze review and pricing or the User Testing review and pricing. You can also browse other Maze alternatives we track.