Matterport vs vHive
Matterport vs vHive, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Matterport is on 53/100 and vHive on 7/100.
Where each one leads
Matterport
- our overall score: 53/100 against 7/100
- agent readiness: 38/100 against 33/100
- domain rating: 92/100 against 15/100
vHive
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Matterport | vHive |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Matterport provides a spatial data platform that turns physical spaces into immersive 3D digital twins. | vHive provides a platform for creating and managing virtual environments for training and collaboration. |
| Category | Spatial Computing, Digital Twin, 3D Modeling, Virtual Tours | Digital Twin, Virtual Environments, Immersive Training, Simulation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2011 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Matterport | vHive |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 531 | Not published |
| Total funding | $198M | Not published |
| Latest round | SPAC | Not published |
| Valuation | $2.9B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 74,493 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Matterport | vHive |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 7/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 3/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | F (33/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 15/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Matterport | vHive |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Matomo |
Matterport vs vHive: common questions
Which is better, Matterport or vHive?
On our 0-100 score Matterport rates higher (53/100 against 7/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Matterport and vHive compare on the numbers?
Matterport leads on our overall score (53/100 against 7/100), agent readiness (38/100 against 33/100), domain rating (92/100 against 15/100).
Read the full Matterport review and pricing or the vHive review and pricing. You can also browse other Matterport alternatives we track.