Matterport vs NavVis
Matterport vs NavVis, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Matterport is on 53/100 and NavVis on 66/100.
Where each one leads
Matterport
- domain rating: 92/100 against 70/100
- headcount: 531 against 413
- funding raised: $198M against $73.2M
- LinkedIn following: 74,493 against 55,761
NavVis
- our overall score: 66/100 against 53/100
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 38/100
At a glance
| Measure | Matterport | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Matterport provides a spatial data platform that turns physical spaces into immersive 3D digital twins. | NavVis provides a spatial twin platform for the built world, offering reality capture solutions and a browser-based SaaS platform for managing and utilizing spatial data. |
| Category | Spatial Computing, Digital Twin, 3D Modeling, Virtual Tours | Spatial Computing, Digital Twins, Enterprise Software, Industrial Technology |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2011 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Sunnyvale, United States | Munich, Germany |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Matterport | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 531 | 413 |
| Total funding | $198M | $73.2M |
| Latest round | SPAC | Series D |
| Valuation | $2.9B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 74,493 | 55,761 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Matterport | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 53/100 | 66/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | Not published | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (38/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 92/100 | 70/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Matterport | NavVis |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Matomo |
Matterport vs NavVis: common questions
Which is better, Matterport or NavVis?
On our 0-100 score NavVis rates higher (66/100 against 53/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Matterport and NavVis compare on the numbers?
Matterport leads on domain rating (92/100 against 70/100), headcount (531 against 413), funding raised ($198M against $73.2M), LinkedIn following (74,493 against 55,761). NavVis leads on our overall score (66/100 against 53/100), agent readiness (43/100 against 38/100).
Read the full Matterport review and pricing or the NavVis review and pricing. You can also browse other Matterport alternatives we track.