Mattermark vs Xverum
Mattermark vs Xverum, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mattermark is on 60/100 and Xverum on 20/100.
Where each one leads
Mattermark
- our overall score: 60/100 against 20/100
- domain rating: 67/100 against 10/100
- LinkedIn following: 4,832 against 1,127
Xverum
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 44/100
- headcount: 42 against 5
At a glance
| Measure | Mattermark | Xverum |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Sales intelligence and deal sourcing platform for investors, sales, and marketing professionals. | Provides precision-built, current, and complete datasets for B2B SaaS and AI/ML companies. |
| Category | Sales Intelligence, Lead Generation, Business Intelligence, Data Platform | Data Platform, B2B SaaS, AI Infrastructure, Machine Learning |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2013 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mattermark | Xverum |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 5 | 42 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -49.5% |
| Total funding | $15.8M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| Valuation | $42.0M | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 4,832 | 1,127 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mattermark | Xverum |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 60/100 | 20/100 |
| Traction | 44/100 | 16/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 53/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (44/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 10/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mattermark | Xverum |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Not detected |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Segment, Hotjar | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | HubSpot |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Mattermark | Xverum |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Not published | Precision-Built Datasets, Near-100% Market Coverage, Rapid Data Refresh Rates, Built-in Compliance, Effortless API Integration, Custom Data Enrichment |
Mattermark vs Xverum: common questions
Which is better, Mattermark or Xverum?
On our 0-100 score Mattermark rates higher (60/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mattermark and Xverum compare on the numbers?
Mattermark leads on our overall score (60/100 against 20/100), domain rating (67/100 against 10/100), LinkedIn following (4,832 against 1,127). Xverum leads on agent readiness (49/100 against 44/100), headcount (42 against 5).
Read the full Mattermark review and pricing or the Xverum review and pricing. You can also browse other Mattermark alternatives we track.