Mathematic.ai vs Shibumi-ai
Mathematic.ai vs Shibumi-ai, compared side by side on 14 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mathematic.ai is on 15/100 and Shibumi-ai on 25/100.
Where each one leads
Mathematic.ai
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 32/100
- domain rating: 20/100 against 2/100
Shibumi-ai
- our overall score: 25/100 against 15/100
- headcount: 4 against 2
At a glance
| Measure | Mathematic.ai | Shibumi-ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Applied algorithmic research services and R&D partner for startups and companies. | Machine learning consulting firm specializing in analyzing business problems and formulating ML solutions. |
| Category | AI Enablers, Custom, Consulting, Algorithmic Research | AI Enablers, Custom, Consulting, MLOps |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Not published | London, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mathematic.ai | Shibumi-ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 4 |
| Latest round | Bootstrapped | Bootstrapped |
| LinkedIn followers | 230 | 260 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mathematic.ai | Shibumi-ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 15/100 | 25/100 |
| Traction | 5/100 | 7/100 |
| Team | Not published | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 21/100 | 27/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (32/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 20/100 | 2/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mathematic.ai | Shibumi-ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| CMS | Wix | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
Mathematic.ai vs Shibumi-ai: common questions
Which is better, Mathematic.ai or Shibumi-ai?
On our 0-100 score Shibumi-ai rates higher (25/100 against 15/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 14 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mathematic.ai and Shibumi-ai compare on the numbers?
Mathematic.ai leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 32/100), domain rating (20/100 against 2/100). Shibumi-ai leads on our overall score (25/100 against 15/100), headcount (4 against 2).
Read the full Mathematic.ai review and pricing or the Shibumi-ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Mathematic.ai alternatives we track.