Material Model (YC S25) vs Waving.ai
Material Model (YC S25) vs Waving.ai, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Material Model (YC S25) is on 50/100 and Waving.ai on 36/100.
Where each one leads
Material Model (YC S25)
- our overall score: 50/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 10/100 against 3/100
Waving.ai
- headcount: 35 against 2
- LinkedIn following: 760 against 385
At a glance
| Measure | Material Model (YC S25) | Waving.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Transforms existing cameras and smart devices into LLM-connected intelligent sensors for visual recognition. | Detects movement and presence through walls and objects using existing Wi-Fi infrastructure. |
| Category | Computer Vision, LLM-based AI, Smart Sensors, IoT | Computer Vision, Edge AI, IoT, Smart Sensors |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Hardware |
| Founded | 2025 | 2021 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Material Model (YC S25) | Waving.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2 | 35 |
| Total funding | $501M | Not published |
| Latest round | Seed | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 385 | 760 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Material Model (YC S25) | Waving.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 50/100 | 36/100 |
| Traction | 45/100 | 16/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 58/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (49/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 10/100 | 3/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Material Model (YC S25) | Waving.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | Not detected |
| CMS | Not detected | Wix |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, PostHog | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Material Model (YC S25) | Waving.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | LLM-based AI, Real-time monitoring, Device communication, No new hardware needed, Customizable instructions, State-of-the-art computer vision | Not published |
Material Model (YC S25) vs Waving.ai: common questions
Which is better, Material Model (YC S25) or Waving.ai?
On our 0-100 score Material Model (YC S25) rates higher (50/100 against 36/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Material Model (YC S25) and Waving.ai compare on the numbers?
Material Model (YC S25) leads on our overall score (50/100 against 36/100), domain rating (10/100 against 3/100). Waving.ai leads on headcount (35 against 2), LinkedIn following (760 against 385).
Read the full Material Model (YC S25) review and pricing or the Waving.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Material Model (YC S25) alternatives we track.