Material Model (YC S25) vs Percepto

Material Model (YC S25) vs Percepto, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Material Model (YC S25) is on 50/100 and Percepto on 69/100.

Material Model (YC S25) logo
Material Model (YC S25)Transforms existing cameras and smart devices into LLM-connected intelligent sensors for visual recognition.
Try Material Model (YC S25)
Percepto logo
PerceptoPercepto provides an autonomous inspection and monitoring platform for industrial sites using drones and robotics.
Try Percepto

Where each one leads

Material Model (YC S25)

  • agent readiness: 49/100 against 39/100
  • funding raised: $501M against $137M

Percepto

  • our overall score: 69/100 against 50/100
  • domain rating: 54/100 against 10/100
  • headcount: 177 against 2
  • LinkedIn following: 28,659 against 385

At a glance

MeasureMaterial Model (YC S25)Percepto
What it isTransforms existing cameras and smart devices into LLM-connected intelligent sensors for visual recognition.Percepto provides an autonomous inspection and monitoring platform for industrial sites using drones and robotics.
CategoryComputer Vision, LLM-based AI, Smart Sensors, IoTDrones, Autonomous, Robotics, Drone Technology
Sells toBusiness modelB2BB2B, B2G
OfferingPlatformHardware, Software
Founded20252014
HeadquartersSan Francisco, United StatesTel Aviv, Israel
StatusActiveActive

Size, funding and growth

MeasureMaterial Model (YC S25)Percepto
Employees2177
Headcount growthLast 12 monthsNot published-18.5%
Total funding$501M$137M
Latest roundSeedSeries C
LinkedIn followers38528,659

StartupHub scores

Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.

MeasureMaterial Model (YC S25)Percepto
StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating50/10069/100
Traction45/10060/100
Team30/10070/100
CommunityNot published8/100
Search visibility30/10046/100
Quality58/10076/100
Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the siteD (49/100)F (39/100)
Domain ratingLink authority, 0-10010/10054/100

Technology

Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.

MeasureMaterial Model (YC S25)Percepto
HostingGoogle CloudNot detected
CDNNot detectedCloudflare
CMSNot detectedWordPress
FrameworksTailwind CSS, BootstrapJquery
AnalyticsGoogle Analytics 4, PostHogHotjar
Open sourceNoYes

Product and pricing

MeasureMaterial Model (YC S25)Percepto
Key featuresLLM-based AI, Real-time monitoring, Device communication, No new hardware needed, Customizable instructions, State-of-the-art computer visionNot published

What users say

MeasureMaterial Model (YC S25)Percepto
Reddit sentimentThreads we trackNot published5 positive, 0 negative across 5 threads
Percepto
📢 is hiring a UAS Deployment Technician - Percepto - Riviera Beach, Florida, Israel!.
r/jobboardsearch

Material Model (YC S25) vs Percepto: common questions

Which is better, Material Model (YC S25) or Percepto?

On our 0-100 score Percepto rates higher (69/100 against 50/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.

How do Material Model (YC S25) and Percepto compare on the numbers?

Material Model (YC S25) leads on agent readiness (49/100 against 39/100), funding raised ($501M against $137M). Percepto leads on our overall score (69/100 against 50/100), domain rating (54/100 against 10/100), headcount (177 against 2), LinkedIn following (28,659 against 385).

What do real users say about Material Model (YC S25) and Percepto?

Percepto: 5 positive and 0 negative mentions across 5 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/jobboardsearch.

Read the full Material Model (YC S25) review and pricing or the Percepto review and pricing. You can also browse other Material Model (YC S25) alternatives we track.