Mater vs UBQ Materials
Mater vs UBQ Materials, compared side by side on 16 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mater is on 25/100 and UBQ Materials on 51/100.
Where each one leads
Mater
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
UBQ Materials
- our overall score: 51/100 against 25/100
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 53/100 against 7/100
- headcount: 80 against 20
- LinkedIn following: 20,076 against 2,011
At a glance
| Measure | Mater | UBQ Materials |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Mater develops sustainable and innovative materials for the construction industry. | UBQ Materials converts unsorted household waste into a sustainable, bio-based thermoplastic material, replacing conventional plastics and other finite resources. |
| Category | Sustainable Materials, Construction Tech, Advanced Manufacturing & Materials, Circular Economy | Cleantech, Recycling, Packaging, Plastic |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Materials | Material |
| Founded | 2017 | 2012 |
| Headquarters | Porto, Portugal | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mater | UBQ Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 20 | 80 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +9.3% |
| Total funding | Not published | $240M |
| Latest round | Not published | Funding Round |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,011 | 20,076 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mater | UBQ Materials |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 25/100 | 51/100 |
| Traction | 13/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 22/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 55/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | D (41/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 7/100 | 53/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mater | UBQ Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Self Managed | Self Managed |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
What users say
| Measure | Mater | UBQ Materials |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 5 positive, 1 negative across 6 threads |
“UBQ Materials can convert 100% of the waste stream to a plastic substitute. Does this mean the end for landfills?.”r/enviroaction
Mater vs UBQ Materials: common questions
Which is better, Mater or UBQ Materials?
On our 0-100 score UBQ Materials rates higher (51/100 against 25/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 16 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mater and UBQ Materials compare on the numbers?
UBQ Materials leads on our overall score (51/100 against 25/100), agent readiness (41/100 against 36/100), domain rating (53/100 against 7/100), headcount (80 against 20), LinkedIn following (20,076 against 2,011).
What do real users say about Mater and UBQ Materials?
UBQ Materials: 5 positive and 1 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/enviroaction.
Read the full Mater review and pricing or the UBQ Materials review and pricing. You can also browse other Mater alternatives we track.