Mastra vs Vanna AI
Mastra vs Vanna AI, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mastra is on 77/100 and Vanna AI on 57/100.
Where each one leads
Mastra
- our overall score: 77/100 against 57/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 54/100
- headcount: 53 against 3
- funding raised: $35.5M against $2.5M
- LinkedIn following: 6,591 against 1,348
Vanna AI
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Mastra | Vanna AI |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An open-source TypeScript/JavaScript framework for building AI agents, from the creators of Gatsby. | An open-source AI-powered SQL agent for natural language database interaction and data insights. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Developer Tools, Open Source | Agentic AI, AI Agent, AI Search Engine, Text-to-SQL |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2024 | 2023 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mastra | Vanna AI |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 53 | 3 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +204.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $35.5M | $2.5M |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,591 | 1,348 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mastra | Vanna AI |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 57/100 |
| Traction | 70/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 38/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 68/100 | 39/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (58/100) | D (59/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 54/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mastra | Vanna AI |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Sveltekit, Svelte, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4 |
| Open source | Yes, 15,100 GitHub stars | Yes, 19,400 GitHub stars |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Mastra | Vanna AI |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | AI Agent Framework, Workflows, RAG, Evals, Memory & Tool Selection, Open Source & Modular | Open-Source, High accuracy on complex datasets, Designed for security, Self learning, Supports many databases, Choose your front end |
What users say
| Measure | Mastra | Vanna AI |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
Mastra vs Vanna AI: common questions
Which is better, Mastra or Vanna AI?
On our 0-100 score Mastra rates higher (77/100 against 57/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mastra and Vanna AI compare on the numbers?
Mastra leads on our overall score (77/100 against 57/100), domain rating (76/100 against 54/100), headcount (53 against 3), funding raised ($35.5M against $2.5M), LinkedIn following (6,591 against 1,348).
Read the full Mastra review and pricing or the Vanna AI review and pricing. You can also browse other Mastra alternatives we track.