Mastra vs TileGraphViewer
Mastra vs TileGraphViewer, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mastra is on 77/100 and TileGraphViewer on 8/100.
Where each one leads
Mastra
- our overall score: 77/100 against 8/100
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 21/100
TileGraphViewer
- domain rating: 94/100 against 76/100
At a glance
| Measure | Mastra | TileGraphViewer |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An open-source TypeScript/JavaScript framework for building AI agents, from the creators of Gatsby. | A web-based application for visualizing and interactively exploring large-scale graphs. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Developer Tools, Open Source | Data Visualization, Graph Visualization, Network Analysis, Knowledge Graphs |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | Not published |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2024 | Not published |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mastra | TileGraphViewer |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 53 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +204.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $35.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,591 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mastra | TileGraphViewer |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 8/100 |
| Traction | 70/100 | Not published |
| Team | 90/100 | Not published |
| Community | 38/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 68/100 | 18/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (58/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 94/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mastra | TileGraphViewer |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Fastly |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes, 15,100 GitHub stars | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Mastra | TileGraphViewer |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | AI Agent Framework, Workflows, RAG, Evals, Memory & Tool Selection, Open Source & Modular | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | Mastra | TileGraphViewer |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
Mastra vs TileGraphViewer: common questions
Which is better, Mastra or TileGraphViewer?
On our 0-100 score Mastra rates higher (77/100 against 8/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mastra and TileGraphViewer compare on the numbers?
Mastra leads on our overall score (77/100 against 8/100), agent readiness (58/100 against 21/100). TileGraphViewer leads on domain rating (94/100 against 76/100).
Read the full Mastra review and pricing or the TileGraphViewer review and pricing. You can also browse other Mastra alternatives we track.