Mastra vs Parallel Web Systems
Mastra vs Parallel Web Systems, compared side by side on 25 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mastra is on 77/100 and Parallel Web Systems on 54/100.
Where each one leads
Mastra
- our overall score: 77/100 against 54/100
- headcount: 53 against 28
Parallel Web Systems
- funding raised: $200M against $35.5M
At a glance
| Measure | Mastra | Parallel Web Systems |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An open-source TypeScript/JavaScript framework for building AI agents, from the creators of Gatsby. | Parallel Web Systems provides a web API purpose-built for AIs, offering the highest accuracy web search and deep research capabilities. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Developer Tools, Open Source | AI Agents, AI Search, AI Infrastructure |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2024 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mastra | Parallel Web Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 53 | 28 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +204.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $35.5M | $200M |
| Latest round | Series A | Growth |
| Valuation | Not published | $2.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,591 | 6,792 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mastra | Parallel Web Systems |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 54/100 |
| Traction | 70/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 38/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 68/100 | 43/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 62/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (58/100) | D (56/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 74/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mastra | Parallel Web Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Vercel |
| CDN | Vercel | Vercel |
| CMS | Not detected | Ghost |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | Yes, 15,100 GitHub stars | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Mastra | Parallel Web Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | AI Agent Framework, Workflows, RAG, Evals, Memory & Tool Selection, Open Source & Modular | Highest accuracy web search for AI, Predictable costs, Evidence-based outputs, Enterprise-grade security, Deep Research API, Structured Data Extraction |
What users say
| Measure | Mastra | Parallel Web Systems |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
Mastra vs Parallel Web Systems: common questions
Which is better, Mastra or Parallel Web Systems?
On our 0-100 score Mastra rates higher (77/100 against 54/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 25 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mastra and Parallel Web Systems compare on the numbers?
Mastra leads on our overall score (77/100 against 54/100), headcount (53 against 28). Parallel Web Systems leads on funding raised ($200M against $35.5M).
Read the full Mastra review and pricing or the Parallel Web Systems review and pricing. You can also browse other Mastra alternatives we track.

