Mastra vs Openmetaverse
Mastra vs Openmetaverse, compared side by side on 10 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mastra is on 77/100 and Openmetaverse on 11/100.
Where each one leads
Mastra
- our overall score: 77/100 against 11/100
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 35/100
- LinkedIn following: 6,591 against 367
Openmetaverse
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Mastra | Openmetaverse |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An open-source TypeScript/JavaScript framework for building AI agents, from the creators of Gatsby. | A non-profit organization dedicated to fostering open standards and software for a scalable, interoperable, and vendor-neutral metaverse. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Developer Tools, Open Source | Metaverse Interoperability, Open Source, Standards, Foundation Model |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | Not published |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2024 | Not published |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mastra | Openmetaverse |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 53 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +204.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $35.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,591 | 367 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mastra | Openmetaverse |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 11/100 |
| Traction | 70/100 | Not published |
| Team | 90/100 | Not published |
| Community | 38/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 68/100 | 18/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (58/100) | F (35/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | Not published |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mastra | Openmetaverse |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Not detected |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes, 15,100 GitHub stars | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Mastra | Openmetaverse |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | AI Agent Framework, Workflows, RAG, Evals, Memory & Tool Selection, Open Source & Modular | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | Mastra | Openmetaverse |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
Mastra vs Openmetaverse: common questions
Which is better, Mastra or Openmetaverse?
On our 0-100 score Mastra rates higher (77/100 against 11/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 10 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mastra and Openmetaverse compare on the numbers?
Mastra leads on our overall score (77/100 against 11/100), agent readiness (58/100 against 35/100), LinkedIn following (6,591 against 367).
Read the full Mastra review and pricing or the Openmetaverse review and pricing. You can also browse other Mastra alternatives we track.