Mastra vs MetaGPT
Mastra vs MetaGPT, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mastra is on 77/100 and MetaGPT on 27/100.
Where each one leads
Mastra
- our overall score: 77/100 against 27/100
- agent readiness: 58/100 against 23/100
- domain rating: 76/100 against 63/100
- headcount: 53 against 15
- LinkedIn following: 6,591 against 1,860
MetaGPT
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Mastra | MetaGPT |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An open-source TypeScript/JavaScript framework for building AI agents, from the creators of Gatsby. | MetaGPT is a multi-agent AI framework and commercial platform that automates complex software development and data analysis tasks through intelligent AI agent collaboration, pioneering natural language programming. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Developer Tools, Open Source | Agentic AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | Not published |
| Offering | Platform | Not published |
| Founded | 2024 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Not published |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mastra | MetaGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 53 | 15 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +204.5% | Not published |
| Total funding | $35.5M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series A | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,591 | 1,860 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mastra | MetaGPT |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 77/100 | 27/100 |
| Traction | 70/100 | 12/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 38/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 68/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (58/100) | F (23/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 63/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mastra | MetaGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Vercel | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Tailwind CSS |
| Open source | Yes, 15,100 GitHub stars | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Mastra | MetaGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | AI Agent Framework, Workflows, RAG, Evals, Memory & Tool Selection, Open Source & Modular | Multi-Agent AI Framework, MetaGPT X, Supabase Integration, Engineer Mode & Auto-Fix Errors, Versatile Solution Generation, Research Leadership |
What users say
| Measure | Mastra | MetaGPT |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 2 votes | Not published |
Mastra vs MetaGPT: common questions
Which is better, Mastra or MetaGPT?
On our 0-100 score Mastra rates higher (77/100 against 27/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mastra and MetaGPT compare on the numbers?
Mastra leads on our overall score (77/100 against 27/100), agent readiness (58/100 against 23/100), domain rating (76/100 against 63/100), headcount (53 against 15), LinkedIn following (6,591 against 1,860).
Read the full Mastra review and pricing or the MetaGPT review and pricing. You can also browse other Mastra alternatives we track.