Mastra vs Metabase
Mastra vs Metabase, compared side by side on 24 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mastra is on 76/100 and Metabase on 60/100.
Where each one leads
Mastra
- our overall score: 76/100 against 60/100
- headcount growth: +204.5% against +8.3%
- funding raised: $35.5M against $8.0M
Metabase
- headcount: 125 against 53
- LinkedIn following: 27,996 against 6,591
At a glance
| Measure | Mastra | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | An open-source TypeScript/JavaScript framework for building AI agents, from the creators of Gatsby. | Open-source business intelligence and embedded analytics platform. |
| Category | Agentic AI, AI Agents, Developer Tools, Open Source | Data Analytics, Business Intelligence, Analytics Platforms, Data Visualization Tools |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2024 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mastra | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 53 | 125 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +204.5% | +8.3% |
| Total funding | $35.5M | $8.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 6,591 | 27,996 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mastra | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 76/100 | 60/100 |
| Traction | 70/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 90/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 25/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 59/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (58/100) | D (58/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 76/100 | 78/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mastra | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | AWS |
| CDN | Vercel | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Bootstrap |
| Open source | Yes, 15,100 GitHub stars | Yes |
| Self-hostable | Yes | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Mastra | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | AI Agent Framework, Workflows, RAG, Evals, Memory & Tool Selection, Open Source & Modular | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | Mastra | Metabase |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
Mastra vs Metabase: common questions
Which is better, Mastra or Metabase?
On our 0-100 score Mastra rates higher (76/100 against 60/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 24 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mastra and Metabase compare on the numbers?
Mastra leads on our overall score (76/100 against 60/100), headcount growth (+204.5% against +8.3%), funding raised ($35.5M against $8.0M). Metabase leads on headcount (125 against 53), LinkedIn following (27,996 against 6,591).
Read the full Mastra review and pricing or the Metabase review and pricing. You can also browse other Mastra alternatives we track.