Mastercard's Tap on Phone vs Square
Mastercard's Tap on Phone vs Square, compared side by side on 13 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mastercard's Tap on Phone is on 20/100 and Square on 67/100.
Where each one leads
Mastercard's Tap on Phone
- headcount: 49,276 against 55
- LinkedIn following: 2,399,890 against 380
Square
- our overall score: 67/100 against 20/100
- agent readiness: 56/100 against 25/100
At a glance
| Measure | Mastercard's Tap on Phone | Square |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Enables merchants to accept contactless payments directly on their smartphones. | An all-in-one financial services platform providing point-of-sale systems, payment processing, and business management tools. |
| Category | Fintech, Payments, Digital Payments, Embedded Finance | Fintech, Payments, Fintech & Payments, Digital Payments |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | Not published | 2009 |
| Headquarters | Purchase, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mastercard's Tap on Phone | Square |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 49,276 | 55 |
| Total funding | Not published | $10.0M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| Valuation | Not published | $30.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 2,399,890 | 380 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mastercard's Tap on Phone | Square |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 20/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 52/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | Not published | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 30/100 | 44/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (25/100) | D (56/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 91/100 | 93/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mastercard's Tap on Phone | Square |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Tailwind CSS |
| Payments | Not detected | Square |
What users say
| Measure | Mastercard's Tap on Phone | Square |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 2 negative across 3 threads |
“After two years of processing payments, with zero notice, and zero reason given Square closed our account Saturday in the middle of the day. I wish I could say we are alone, so many folks have posted on the BBB that this makes me think that”r/smallbusiness
Mastercard's Tap on Phone vs Square: common questions
Which is better, Mastercard's Tap on Phone or Square?
On our 0-100 score Square rates higher (67/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 13 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mastercard's Tap on Phone and Square compare on the numbers?
Mastercard's Tap on Phone leads on headcount (49,276 against 55), LinkedIn following (2,399,890 against 380). Square leads on our overall score (67/100 against 20/100), agent readiness (56/100 against 25/100).
What do real users say about Mastercard's Tap on Phone and Square?
Square: 0 positive and 2 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/smallbusiness.
Read the full Mastercard's Tap on Phone review and pricing or the Square review and pricing. You can also browse other Mastercard's Tap on Phone alternatives we track.