MariaDB vs Silk
MariaDB vs Silk, compared side by side on 22 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: MariaDB is on 61/100 and Silk on 63/100.
Where each one leads
MariaDB
- agent readiness: 57/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 84/100 against 50/100
- LinkedIn following: 26,632 against 5,024
Silk
- headcount: 490 against 357
- funding raised: $238M against $131M
At a glance
| Measure | MariaDB | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A cloud database company providing a unified platform for transactional, analytical, and AI workloads. | Silk provides a data virtualization platform for cloud workloads, accelerating performance without refactoring. |
| Category | Database, Cloud Database, Open Source, Enterprise Software | Database, Enterprise, Optimization, Virtualization |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2009 | 2008 |
| Headquarters | Redwood City, United States | Palo Alto, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | MariaDB | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 357 | 490 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +25.0% |
| Total funding | $131M | $238M |
| Latest round | Series D | Series G |
| Valuation | $672M | $550M |
| LinkedIn followers | 26,632 | 5,024 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | MariaDB | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 61/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 20/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (57/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 84/100 | 50/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | MariaDB | Silk |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Google Cloud |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Open source | Yes | No |
| Self-hostable | Yes | No |
MariaDB vs Silk: common questions
Which is better, MariaDB or Silk?
On our 0-100 score Silk rates higher (63/100 against 61/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 22 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do MariaDB and Silk compare on the numbers?
MariaDB leads on agent readiness (57/100 against 21/100), domain rating (84/100 against 50/100), LinkedIn following (26,632 against 5,024). Silk leads on headcount (490 against 357), funding raised ($238M against $131M).
Read the full MariaDB review and pricing or the Silk review and pricing. You can also browse other MariaDB alternatives we track.