Mantis Vision vs Surgical Theater
Mantis Vision vs Surgical Theater, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mantis Vision is on 49/100 and Surgical Theater on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Mantis Vision
- funding raised: $77.2M against $9.0M
Surgical Theater
- our overall score: 55/100 against 49/100
- agent readiness: 30/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 39/100 against 30/100
- headcount: 85 against 37
- headcount growth: +16.8% against -8.8%
- LinkedIn following: 9,557 against 5,713
At a glance
| Measure | Mantis Vision | Surgical Theater |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Mantis Vision develops high-quality, user-friendly 3D capturing technologies for various applications and markets. | Surgical Theater combines fighter jet flight simulation technology with patient anatomy scans to create 360°-3D virtual reality for surgical planning and navigation. |
| Category | 3D, Augmented Reality (AR), Virtual Reality (VR), 3D Capturing | Healthcare, Surgery, Virtual Reality (VR), Augmented Reality (AR) |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C, B2G | B2B |
| Offering | Software, Hardware | Hardware, Software |
| Founded | 2005 | 2010 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Cleveland, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mantis Vision | Surgical Theater |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 37 | 85 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | -8.8% | +16.8% |
| Total funding | $77.2M | $9.0M |
| Latest round | Series E | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 5,713 | 9,557 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mantis Vision | Surgical Theater |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 49/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 55/100 | 54/100 |
| Team | 20/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 15/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 28/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 55/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 30/100 | 39/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mantis Vision | Surgical Theater |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
Mantis Vision vs Surgical Theater: common questions
Which is better, Mantis Vision or Surgical Theater?
On our 0-100 score Surgical Theater rates higher (55/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mantis Vision and Surgical Theater compare on the numbers?
Mantis Vision leads on funding raised ($77.2M against $9.0M). Surgical Theater leads on our overall score (55/100 against 49/100), agent readiness (30/100 against 22/100), domain rating (39/100 against 30/100), headcount (85 against 37), headcount growth (+16.8% against -8.8%), LinkedIn following (9,557 against 5,713).
Read the full Mantis Vision review and pricing or the Surgical Theater review and pricing. You can also browse other Mantis Vision alternatives we track.