Mandiant vs Rapid7
Mandiant vs Rapid7, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mandiant is on 68/100 and Rapid7 on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Mandiant
- our overall score: 68/100 against 55/100
- domain rating: 99/100 against 83/100
- funding raised: $220M against $63.0M
Rapid7
- agent readiness: 51/100 against 43/100
At a glance
| Measure | Mandiant | Rapid7 |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Intelligence-led cybersecurity company specializing in threat detection, incident response, and cyber defense. | Cybersecurity solutions provider focused on vulnerability management, detection, and response. |
| Category | Cybersecurity, Threat Intelligence, Incident Response, Cyber Defense | Cybersecurity, Artificial Intelligence, Vulnerability Management, Application Security |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Services | Software |
| Founded | 2004 | 2000 |
| Headquarters | Reston, United States | Boston, USA |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mandiant | Rapid7 |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 3,275 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +1.8% |
| Total funding | $220M | $63.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series D |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 223,367 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mandiant | Rapid7 |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 68/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 2/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 90/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (43/100) | D (51/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 99/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mandiant | Rapid7 |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Google Cloud | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | Mandiant | Rapid7 |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 2 negative across 6 threads |
“Our penetration team contractor recommended that we go with Rapid7, we had a quick demo with them and from what I've seen everything that they have seems pretty robust. Was wondering if there was anyone who has used Rapid7 in the field and ”r/cybersecurity
Mandiant vs Rapid7: common questions
Which is better, Mandiant or Rapid7?
On our 0-100 score Mandiant rates higher (68/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mandiant and Rapid7 compare on the numbers?
Mandiant leads on our overall score (68/100 against 55/100), domain rating (99/100 against 83/100), funding raised ($220M against $63.0M). Rapid7 leads on agent readiness (51/100 against 43/100).
What do real users say about Mandiant and Rapid7?
Rapid7: 1 positive and 2 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/cybersecurity.
Read the full Mandiant review and pricing or the Rapid7 review and pricing. You can also browse other Mandiant alternatives we track.