Mambu vs ZeroHash
Mambu vs ZeroHash, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Mambu is on 67/100 and ZeroHash on 49/100.
Where each one leads
Mambu
- our overall score: 67/100 against 49/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 57/100
- headcount: 766 against 231
- funding raised: $444M against $255M
- LinkedIn following: 90,530 against 25,227
ZeroHash
- agent readiness: 48/100 against 33/100
At a glance
| Measure | Mambu | ZeroHash |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | The composable, API-first cloud banking platform. | Provides embedded crypto infrastructure for fintechs and marketplaces to offer digital asset services. |
| Category | Fintech, Banking, Cloud Computing, Payments | Fintech, Payments, Digital Payments, Embedded Finance |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2011 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | Berlin, Germany | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Mambu | ZeroHash |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 766 | 231 |
| Total funding | $444M | $255M |
| Latest round | Series E | Not published |
| Valuation | $4.9B | $400 |
| LinkedIn followers | 90,530 | 25,227 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Mambu | ZeroHash |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 67/100 | 49/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | Not published | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 20/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 45/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (33/100) | D (48/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 57/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Mambu | ZeroHash |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Netlify | Not detected |
| CDN | Netlify | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager |
Mambu vs ZeroHash: common questions
Which is better, Mambu or ZeroHash?
On our 0-100 score Mambu rates higher (67/100 against 49/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Mambu and ZeroHash compare on the numbers?
Mambu leads on our overall score (67/100 against 49/100), domain rating (71/100 against 57/100), headcount (766 against 231), funding raised ($444M against $255M), LinkedIn following (90,530 against 25,227). ZeroHash leads on agent readiness (48/100 against 33/100).
Read the full Mambu review and pricing or the ZeroHash review and pricing. You can also browse other Mambu alternatives we track.