Makersite vs Material Evolution
Makersite vs Material Evolution, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Makersite is on 38/100 and Material Evolution on 42/100.
Where each one leads
Makersite
- agent readiness: 41/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 51/100 against 35/100
- funding raised: $150M against $22.3M
Material Evolution
- our overall score: 42/100 against 38/100
At a glance
| Measure | Makersite | Material Evolution |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered platform for sustainable product development and supply chain management. | Developing ultra-low carbon cement using AI-driven alkali-fusion technology from industrial waste. |
| Category | Sustainability, Product Lifecycle Management, Supply Chain Management, AI | Sustainability, Construction Tech, Materials Science, AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Hardware |
| Founded | 2017 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Berlin, Germany | Middlesbrough, United Kingdom |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Makersite | Material Evolution |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 156 | Not published |
| Open roles | 2 | Not published |
| Total funding | $150M | $22.3M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 12,175 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Makersite | Material Evolution |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 38/100 | 42/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 37/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 8/100 |
| Quality | 40/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (41/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 51/100 | 35/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Makersite | Material Evolution |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Jquery | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Analytics 4 |
| Support stack | Intercom | HubSpot |
Makersite vs Material Evolution: common questions
Which is better, Makersite or Material Evolution?
On our 0-100 score Material Evolution rates higher (42/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Makersite and Material Evolution compare on the numbers?
Makersite leads on agent readiness (41/100 against 21/100), domain rating (51/100 against 35/100), funding raised ($150M against $22.3M). Material Evolution leads on our overall score (42/100 against 38/100).
Read the full Makersite review and pricing or the Material Evolution review and pricing. You can also browse other Makersite alternatives we track.