make.com vs Workato
make.com vs Workato, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: make.com is on 63/100 and Workato on 67/100.
Where each one leads
make.com
- domain rating: 90/100 against 80/100
- headcount growth: +500.0% against +22.2%
Workato
- our overall score: 67/100 against 63/100
- headcount: 1,392 against 709
- LinkedIn following: 97,529 against 13
At a glance
| Measure | make.com | Workato |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Visual platform to build and automate workflows across thousands of apps without code. | Enterprise automation and integration platform enabling agentic AI. |
| Category | iPaaS, Workflow Automation, Integration Platform, No-Code Automation | Automation & RPA, AI Automation, Customer Service, AI Agents |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2012 | 2013 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Mountain View, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | make.com | Workato |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 709 | 1,392 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | +22.2% |
| Valuation | Not published | $5.4B |
| LinkedIn followers | 13 | 97,529 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | make.com | Workato |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 67/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 58/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 13/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 46/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (45/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | make.com | Workato |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Nuxt |
Product and pricing
| Measure | make.com | Workato |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Visual Workflow Builder, Extensive App Integrations, Advanced Logic & Error Handling, Data Transformation Tools, Real-time Monitoring & Logging, Blueprint & Template Library | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | make.com | Workato |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
make.com vs Workato: common questions
Which is better, make.com or Workato?
On our 0-100 score Workato rates higher (67/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do make.com and Workato compare on the numbers?
make.com leads on domain rating (90/100 against 80/100), headcount growth (+500.0% against +22.2%). Workato leads on our overall score (67/100 against 63/100), headcount (1,392 against 709), LinkedIn following (97,529 against 13).
Read the full make.com review and pricing or the Workato review and pricing. You can also browse other make.com alternatives we track.