make.com vs Quickbase
make.com vs Quickbase, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: make.com is on 63/100 and Quickbase on 69/100.
Where each one leads
make.com
- domain rating: 90/100 against 80/100
- headcount growth: +500.0% against -24.4%
Quickbase
- our overall score: 69/100 against 63/100
- funding raised: $1.0B against $100M
- LinkedIn following: 27,996 against 13
At a glance
| Measure | make.com | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Visual platform to build and automate workflows across thousands of apps without code. | Low-code application platform for work management, centralizing complex projects and processes. |
| Category | iPaaS, Workflow Automation, Integration Platform, No-Code Automation | Work Management, Low-Code Development, Application Platform, Business Process Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2012 | 1999 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Waltham, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | make.com | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 709 | 814 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | -24.4% |
| Total funding | $100M | $1.0B |
| Latest round | Series B | Acquisition |
| LinkedIn followers | 13 | 27,996 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | make.com | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 69/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 13/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 78/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 80/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | make.com | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js, Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | make.com | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Visual Workflow Builder, Extensive App Integrations, Advanced Logic & Error Handling, Data Transformation Tools, Real-time Monitoring & Logging, Blueprint & Template Library | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | make.com | Quickbase |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
make.com vs Quickbase: common questions
Which is better, make.com or Quickbase?
On our 0-100 score Quickbase rates higher (69/100 against 63/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do make.com and Quickbase compare on the numbers?
make.com leads on domain rating (90/100 against 80/100), headcount growth (+500.0% against -24.4%). Quickbase leads on our overall score (69/100 against 63/100), funding raised ($1.0B against $100M), LinkedIn following (27,996 against 13).
Read the full make.com review and pricing or the Quickbase review and pricing. You can also browse other make.com alternatives we track.