make.com vs Pipedream
make.com vs Pipedream, compared side by side on 18 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: make.com is on 63/100 and Pipedream on 52/100.
Where each one leads
make.com
- our overall score: 63/100 against 52/100
- funding raised: $100M against $55.0M
Pipedream
- agent readiness: 66/100 against 46/100
At a glance
| Measure | make.com | Pipedream |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Visual platform to build and automate workflows across thousands of apps without code. | Workflow automation platform for developers to connect APIs and build integrations. |
| Category | iPaaS, Workflow Automation, Integration Platform, No-Code Automation | Workflow Automation, API Platform, Developer Tools, Integration Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2012 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | make.com | Pipedream |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 709 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $100M | $55.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 13 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | make.com | Pipedream |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 52/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 39/100 |
| Team | 30/100 | 30/100 |
| Community | 13/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 15/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | C (66/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 83/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | make.com | Pipedream |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Not detected | Framer |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Product and pricing
| Measure | make.com | Pipedream |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Visual Workflow Builder, Extensive App Integrations, Advanced Logic & Error Handling, Data Transformation Tools, Real-time Monitoring & Logging, Blueprint & Template Library | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | make.com | Pipedream |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
make.com vs Pipedream: common questions
Which is better, make.com or Pipedream?
On our 0-100 score make.com rates higher (63/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 18 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do make.com and Pipedream compare on the numbers?
make.com leads on our overall score (63/100 against 52/100), funding raised ($100M against $55.0M). Pipedream leads on agent readiness (66/100 against 46/100).
Read the full make.com review and pricing or the Pipedream review and pricing. You can also browse other make.com alternatives we track.