make.com vs Microsoft Power Automate
make.com vs Microsoft Power Automate, compared side by side on 11 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: make.com is on 63/100 and Microsoft Power Automate on 10/100.
Where each one leads
make.com
- our overall score: 63/100 against 10/100
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 39/100
Microsoft Power Automate
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | make.com | Microsoft Power Automate |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Visual platform to build and automate workflows across thousands of apps without code. | Cloud-based platform for automating workflows and business processes across applications and services. |
| Category | iPaaS, Workflow Automation, Integration Platform, No-Code Automation | Workflow Automation, Robotic Process Automation, Digital Process Automation, Business Process Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2012 | 2016 |
| Headquarters | Tel Aviv, Israel | Redmond, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | make.com | Microsoft Power Automate |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 709 | Not published |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +500.0% | Not published |
| Total funding | $100M | Not published |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 13 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | make.com | Microsoft Power Automate |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 10/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Community | 13/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 18/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 90/100 | 96/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | make.com | Microsoft Power Automate |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
Product and pricing
| Measure | make.com | Microsoft Power Automate |
|---|---|---|
| Key features | Visual Workflow Builder, Extensive App Integrations, Advanced Logic & Error Handling, Data Transformation Tools, Real-time Monitoring & Logging, Blueprint & Template Library | Not published |
What users say
| Measure | make.com | Microsoft Power Automate |
|---|---|---|
| Community ratingVisitor votes on StartupHub | 5.0/5 from 1 vote | Not published |
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 1 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads |
“TL;DR: Power Automate is the easiest on-ramp to automation, already included in many Microsoft licenses, integrates seamlessly with Office tools, delivers strong ROI, and has a free 30-day premium trial to learn. Something like 10% of busin”r/automation
make.com vs Microsoft Power Automate: common questions
Which is better, make.com or Microsoft Power Automate?
On our 0-100 score make.com rates higher (63/100 against 10/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 11 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do make.com and Microsoft Power Automate compare on the numbers?
make.com leads on our overall score (63/100 against 10/100), agent readiness (46/100 against 39/100).
What do real users say about make.com and Microsoft Power Automate?
Microsoft Power Automate: 1 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/automation.
Read the full make.com review and pricing or the Microsoft Power Automate review and pricing. You can also browse other make.com alternatives we track.