MagicLab vs Uma
MagicLab vs Uma, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: MagicLab is on 52/100 and Uma on 58/100.
Where each one leads
MagicLab
- funding raised: $89.1M against $40.0M
Uma
- our overall score: 58/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 36/100 against 0/100
At a glance
| Measure | MagicLab | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Develops general-purpose humanoid and quadruped robots powered by embodied AI. | Developing advanced physical AI and humanoid robots for industrial and domestic environments, focusing on real-world performance and learning through demonstration. |
| Category | Robotics, Embodied AI, Advanced Manufacturing, Manufacturing | Robotics, Artificial Intelligence, Deep Tech, Hardware |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Hardware |
| Founded | 2023 | 2025 |
| Headquarters | Wuxi, China | Paris, France |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | MagicLab | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | Not published | 29 |
| Total funding | $89.1M | $40.0M |
| Latest round | Series A | Seed |
| Valuation | $1.4B | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 5,831 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | MagicLab | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 58/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 53/100 |
| Team | 50/100 | 30/100 |
| Search visibility | 3/100 | 42/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 70/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (21/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 0/100 | 36/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | MagicLab | Uma |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Not detected | Vercel |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Next.js |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Tag Manager |
MagicLab vs Uma: common questions
Which is better, MagicLab or Uma?
On our 0-100 score Uma rates higher (58/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do MagicLab and Uma compare on the numbers?
MagicLab leads on funding raised ($89.1M against $40.0M). Uma leads on our overall score (58/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 21/100), domain rating (36/100 against 0/100).
Read the full MagicLab review and pricing or the Uma review and pricing. You can also browse other MagicLab alternatives we track.