timeOS vs Reclaim.ai
timeOS vs Reclaim.ai, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: timeOS is on 55/100 and Reclaim.ai on 61/100.
Where each one leads
timeOS
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
Reclaim.ai
- our overall score: 61/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 43/100 against 28/100
- domain rating: 82/100 against 30/100
- headcount: 23 against 14
- funding raised: $8.0M against $3.3M
- LinkedIn following: 5,355 against 3,554
At a glance
| Measure | timeOS | Reclaim.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | AI-powered calendar assistant that automates scheduling, note-taking, and task management. | Intelligent scheduling tool that automatically protects time for priorities. |
| Category | Personal, Scheduling, Productivity, Agentic AI | Productivity Software, Calendar Automation, Time Management, Workflow Automation |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2019 | 2019 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | timeOS | Reclaim.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 14 | 23 |
| Total funding | $3.3M | $8.0M |
| Latest round | Seed | Series A |
| LinkedIn followers | 3,554 | 5,355 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | timeOS | Reclaim.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 55/100 | 61/100 |
| Traction | 44/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | 15/100 |
| Search visibility | 38/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 62/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (28/100) | D (43/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 30/100 | 82/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | timeOS | Reclaim.ai |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Webflow | Webflow |
| Analytics | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Mixpanel | Google Tag Manager |
| Open source | Yes | No |
timeOS vs Reclaim.ai: common questions
Which is better, timeOS or Reclaim.ai?
On our 0-100 score Reclaim.ai rates higher (61/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do timeOS and Reclaim.ai compare on the numbers?
Reclaim.ai leads on our overall score (61/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (43/100 against 28/100), domain rating (82/100 against 30/100), headcount (23 against 14), funding raised ($8.0M against $3.3M), LinkedIn following (5,355 against 3,554).
Read the full timeOS review and pricing or the Reclaim.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other timeOS alternatives we track.