Magic Square vs TradingView
Magic Square vs TradingView, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Magic Square is on 38/100 and TradingView on 75/100.
Where each one leads
Magic Square
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
TradingView
- our overall score: 75/100 against 38/100
- agent readiness: 49/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 2/100
- headcount: 2,773 against 15
At a glance
| Measure | Magic Square | TradingView |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A Web3 app store for discovering and earning rewards from decentralized applications, games, and AI agents. | Global platform for traders and investors with advanced charting and market data. |
| Category | Fintech, Trading, Algorithmic Trading, AI-Driven Trading | Fintech, Marketplace, Data Platform, Analytics Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2C |
| Offering | Software | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2011 |
| Headquarters | Not published | New York, United States |
| Status | Inactive | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Magic Square | TradingView |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 15 | 2,773 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +27.5% |
| Total funding | Not published | $389M |
| Latest round | Not published | Series C |
| LinkedIn followers | Not published | 100,288 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Magic Square | TradingView |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 38/100 | 75/100 |
| Traction | 42/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 60/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | Not published | 59/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (22/100) | D (49/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 2/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Magic Square | TradingView |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Not detected | CloudFront |
Product and pricing
| Measure | Magic Square | TradingView |
|---|---|---|
| Current offer | Not published | $15 coupon |
Magic Square vs TradingView: common questions
Which is better, Magic Square or TradingView?
On our 0-100 score TradingView rates higher (75/100 against 38/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Magic Square and TradingView compare on the numbers?
TradingView leads on our overall score (75/100 against 38/100), agent readiness (49/100 against 22/100), domain rating (91/100 against 2/100), headcount (2,773 against 15).
Read the full Magic Square review and pricing or the TradingView review and pricing. You can also browse other Magic Square alternatives we track.