Magic Software Enterprises vs Tonkean
Magic Software Enterprises vs Tonkean, compared side by side on 17 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Magic Software Enterprises is on 23/100 and Tonkean on 62/100.
Where each one leads
Magic Software Enterprises
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 42/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 63/100
- headcount: 482 against 80
Tonkean
- our overall score: 62/100 against 23/100
At a glance
| Measure | Magic Software Enterprises | Tonkean |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Global provider of low-code development, integration, and industry solutions for digital transformation. | AI-powered platform for enterprise intake and process orchestration, automating workflows for procurement, legal, and IT. |
| Category | Low Code, Integration Platform, Digital Transformation, Enterprise Software | Enterprise Software, Workflow Automation, Process Automation, Business Process Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 1983 | 2015 |
| Headquarters | Or Yehuda, Israel | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Magic Software Enterprises | Tonkean |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 482 | 80 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | -0.4% |
| Total funding | Not published | $83.2M |
| Latest round | Bootstrapped | Series B |
| LinkedIn followers | 8,981 | 10,015 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Magic Software Enterprises | Tonkean |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 23/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 20/100 | 59/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Search visibility | 32/100 | 35/100 |
| Quality | Not published | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | D (42/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 71/100 | 63/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Magic Software Enterprises | Tonkean |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | WordPress | Webflow |
| Frameworks | Jquery, Bootstrap | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Support stack | HubSpot | Not detected |
What users say
| Measure | Magic Software Enterprises | Tonkean |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 2 positive, 1 negative across 4 threads | Not published |
“Magic Software Enterprises Ltd. (NASDAQ and TASE: MGIC) is a global provider of enterprise-grade application development and business process integration software solutions and a vendor of a broad range of software and IT services (hereafte”r/u/worldfinancialdata
Magic Software Enterprises vs Tonkean: common questions
Which is better, Magic Software Enterprises or Tonkean?
On our 0-100 score Tonkean rates higher (62/100 against 23/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 17 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Magic Software Enterprises and Tonkean compare on the numbers?
Magic Software Enterprises leads on agent readiness (47/100 against 42/100), domain rating (71/100 against 63/100), headcount (482 against 80). Tonkean leads on our overall score (62/100 against 23/100).
What do real users say about Magic Software Enterprises and Tonkean?
Magic Software Enterprises: 2 positive and 1 negative mentions across 4 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/u/worldfinancialdata.
Read the full Magic Software Enterprises review and pricing or the Tonkean review and pricing. You can also browse other Magic Software Enterprises alternatives we track.