Newton Labs vs StarkWare
Newton Labs vs StarkWare, compared side by side on 23 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Newton Labs is on 59/100 and StarkWare on 73/100.
Where each one leads
Newton Labs
- agent readiness: 46/100 against 30/100
StarkWare
- our overall score: 73/100 against 59/100
- domain rating: 71/100 against 46/100
- headcount: 194 against 8
- funding raised: $180M against $52.0M
- LinkedIn following: 20,607 against 156
At a glance
| Measure | Newton Labs | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Newton Labs is building an authorization layer for onchain finance, enabling institutions and protocols to enforce compliance, identity, security, and risk policies before transactions settle. | Develops blockchain scaling solutions using STARK technology for Ethereum-secure, fast, and seamless user experiences. |
| Category | Blockchain, Fintech, Web3, Cryptocurrency | Blockchain, NFT, Crypto, Cryptocurrency |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Platform | Platform |
| Founded | 2018 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Newton Labs | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 8 | 194 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | Not published | +15.6% |
| Total funding | $52.0M | $180M |
| Latest round | Strategic | Series D |
| Valuation | $499M | $8.0B |
| LinkedIn followers | 156 | 20,607 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Newton Labs | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 59/100 | 73/100 |
| Traction | 48/100 | 60/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 26/100 | 38/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (46/100) | F (30/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 46/100 | 71/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Newton Labs | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Vercel | Not detected |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Google Tag Manager, Hotjar |
| Support stack | Not detected | HubSpot |
| Agentic commerceMachine-readable checkout or agent payment rails | Not detected | Walletconnect |
| Open source | No | Yes |
What users say
| Measure | Newton Labs | StarkWare |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 0 positive, 1 negative across 3 threads | Not published |
“Magic Labs will discontinue support for Algorand wallets accessed through Email Login, Google, Apple, X (Twitter), Discord, and Twitch authentication on July 29, 2026 at 12:00 PM PT.. https://reveal.magic.link/algorand/exa-market”r/AlgorandOfficial
Newton Labs vs StarkWare: common questions
Which is better, Newton Labs or StarkWare?
On our 0-100 score StarkWare rates higher (73/100 against 59/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 23 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Newton Labs and StarkWare compare on the numbers?
Newton Labs leads on agent readiness (46/100 against 30/100). StarkWare leads on our overall score (73/100 against 59/100), domain rating (71/100 against 46/100), headcount (194 against 8), funding raised ($180M against $52.0M), LinkedIn following (20,607 against 156).
What do real users say about Newton Labs and StarkWare?
Newton Labs: 0 positive and 1 negative mentions across 3 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/AlgorandOfficial.
Read the full Newton Labs review and pricing or the StarkWare review and pricing. You can also browse other Newton Labs alternatives we track.