Magic Eden vs OpenSea
Magic Eden vs OpenSea, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Magic Eden is on 52/100 and OpenSea on 63/100.
Where each one leads
Magic Eden
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
OpenSea
- our overall score: 63/100 against 52/100
- agent readiness: 61/100 against 36/100
- domain rating: 91/100 against 73/100
- funding raised: $423M against $157M
At a glance
| Measure | Magic Eden | OpenSea |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | A leading multi-chain NFT marketplace for discovering, trading, and creating digital assets and collectibles. | A multi-chain crypto trading aggregator for NFTs, tokens, and other digital assets. |
| Category | Fintech, Web3, Blockchain, NFT | Fintech, Web3, Blockchain |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2C |
| Offering | Marketplace | Marketplace |
| Founded | 2021 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | San Francisco, United States | New York, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Magic Eden | OpenSea |
|---|---|---|
| Total funding | $157M | $423M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series C |
| Valuation | $1.6B | $13B |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Magic Eden | OpenSea |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 52/100 | 63/100 |
| Traction | 40/100 | 40/100 |
| Team | Not published | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 16/100 | 22/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 86/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | F (36/100) | C (61/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 73/100 | 91/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Magic Eden | OpenSea |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| Frameworks | Next.js, Tailwind CSS | Next.js |
| Open source | No | Yes |
Magic Eden vs OpenSea: common questions
Which is better, Magic Eden or OpenSea?
On our 0-100 score OpenSea rates higher (63/100 against 52/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Magic Eden and OpenSea compare on the numbers?
OpenSea leads on our overall score (63/100 against 52/100), agent readiness (61/100 against 36/100), domain rating (91/100 against 73/100), funding raised ($423M against $157M).
Read the full Magic Eden review and pricing or the OpenSea review and pricing. You can also browse other Magic Eden alternatives we track.