MACOM vs NeuroBlade
MACOM vs NeuroBlade, compared side by side on 21 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: MACOM is on 42/100 and NeuroBlade on 62/100.
Where each one leads
MACOM
- domain rating: 67/100 against 52/100
- headcount: 2,182 against 34
- headcount growth: +17.8% against -28.9%
- LinkedIn following: 36,105 against 4,593
NeuroBlade
- our overall score: 62/100 against 42/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 40/100
- funding raised: $111M against $70.0M
At a glance
| Measure | MACOM | NeuroBlade |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Designs and manufactures high-performance semiconductor products for advanced networks and defense. | Semiconductor hardware company accelerating data analytics query processing speed and scale. |
| Category | Semiconductor, Chip Design, AI Chip, AI Hardware | Semiconductor, Hardware, Data Analytics, Data Center |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Hardware | Software, Hardware |
| Founded | 1950 | 2017 |
| Headquarters | Lowell, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | MACOM | NeuroBlade |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 2,182 | 34 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +17.8% | -28.9% |
| Total funding | $70.0M | $111M |
| Latest round | Grant (prize money) | Series B |
| Valuation | Not published | $100M |
| LinkedIn followers | 36,105 | 4,593 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | MACOM | NeuroBlade |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 42/100 | 62/100 |
| Traction | 59/100 | 55/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Search visibility | 27/100 | 34/100 |
| Quality | 30/100 | 68/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (40/100) | D (47/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 67/100 | 52/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | MACOM | NeuroBlade |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Tailwind CSS, Bootstrap | Jquery |
What users say
| Measure | MACOM | NeuroBlade |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | 4 positive, 0 negative across 6 threads | Not published |
“MACOM and Elve to Demonstrate a V-Band Linearized TWTA for Satellite Communications and Defense Applications at IMS 2026.”r/Quantisnow
MACOM vs NeuroBlade: common questions
Which is better, MACOM or NeuroBlade?
On our 0-100 score NeuroBlade rates higher (62/100 against 42/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 21 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do MACOM and NeuroBlade compare on the numbers?
MACOM leads on domain rating (67/100 against 52/100), headcount (2,182 against 34), headcount growth (+17.8% against -28.9%), LinkedIn following (36,105 against 4,593). NeuroBlade leads on our overall score (62/100 against 42/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 40/100), funding raised ($111M against $70.0M).
What do real users say about MACOM and NeuroBlade?
MACOM: 4 positive and 0 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/Quantisnow.
Read the full MACOM review and pricing or the NeuroBlade review and pricing. You can also browse other MACOM alternatives we track.