M-KOPA vs Tarya
M-KOPA vs Tarya, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: M-KOPA is on 63/100 and Tarya on 41/100.
Where each one leads
M-KOPA
- our overall score: 63/100 against 41/100
- agent readiness: 42/100 against 21/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 31/100
- headcount: 3,269 against 41
- funding raised: $325M against $2.6M
- LinkedIn following: 86,854 against 2,175
Tarya
- headcount growth: +31.2% against +9.6%
At a glance
| Measure | M-KOPA | Tarya |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Fintech platform providing affordable smartphones and digital financial services to 'Every Day Earners' in Sub-Saharan Africa. | Tarya is an Israeli P2P investment and loan platform leveraging fintech and big data to empower individuals with financial control. |
| Category | Fintech, Embedded Finance, Payments, Consumer Electronics | Fintech, Credit, Lending, Platform |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B, B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Software |
| Founded | 2010 | 2014 |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | M-KOPA | Tarya |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3,269 | 41 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +9.6% | +31.2% |
| Total funding | $325M | $2.6M |
| Latest round | Debt and Equity | Seed |
| Valuation | Not published | $20.0M |
| LinkedIn followers | 86,854 | 2,175 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | M-KOPA | Tarya |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 41/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 48/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | 8/100 |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | F (21/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 31/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | M-KOPA | Tarya |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Self Managed |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
M-KOPA vs Tarya: common questions
Which is better, M-KOPA or Tarya?
On our 0-100 score M-KOPA rates higher (63/100 against 41/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do M-KOPA and Tarya compare on the numbers?
M-KOPA leads on our overall score (63/100 against 41/100), agent readiness (42/100 against 21/100), domain rating (62/100 against 31/100), headcount (3,269 against 41), funding raised ($325M against $2.6M), LinkedIn following (86,854 against 2,175). Tarya leads on headcount growth (+31.2% against +9.6%).
Read the full M-KOPA review and pricing or the Tarya review and pricing. You can also browse other M-KOPA alternatives we track.