M-KOPA vs Members Mobile
M-KOPA vs Members Mobile, compared side by side on 15 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: M-KOPA is on 63/100 and Members Mobile on 20/100.
Where each one leads
M-KOPA
- our overall score: 63/100 against 20/100
- domain rating: 62/100 against 7/100
- headcount: 3,269 against 12
- LinkedIn following: 86,854 against 976
Members Mobile
- agent readiness: 61/100 against 42/100
At a glance
| Measure | M-KOPA | Members Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Fintech platform providing affordable smartphones and digital financial services to 'Every Day Earners' in Sub-Saharan Africa. | Credit union-focused mobile service provider integrating mobile phone plans with financial technology solutions. |
| Category | Fintech, Embedded Finance, Payments, Consumer Electronics | Fintech, Telecommunications, Financial Services, Mobile Virtual Network Operator |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2C | B2B2C |
| Offering | Platform | Services |
| Founded | 2010 | Not published |
| Headquarters | London, United Kingdom | Broomfield, United States |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | M-KOPA | Members Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 3,269 | 12 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +9.6% | Not published |
| Total funding | $325M | Not published |
| Latest round | Debt and Equity | Funding Round |
| Valuation | Not published | $1.1B |
| LinkedIn followers | 86,854 | 976 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | M-KOPA | Members Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 63/100 | 20/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 11/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | Not published |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 24/100 | 33/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (42/100) | C (61/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 62/100 | 7/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | M-KOPA | Members Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | AWS |
| CDN | Cloudflare | CloudFront |
| CMS | Webflow | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager, Microsoft Clarity | Not detected |
M-KOPA vs Members Mobile: common questions
Which is better, M-KOPA or Members Mobile?
On our 0-100 score M-KOPA rates higher (63/100 against 20/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 15 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do M-KOPA and Members Mobile compare on the numbers?
M-KOPA leads on our overall score (63/100 against 20/100), domain rating (62/100 against 7/100), headcount (3,269 against 12), LinkedIn following (86,854 against 976). Members Mobile leads on agent readiness (61/100 against 42/100).
Read the full M-KOPA review and pricing or the Members Mobile review and pricing. You can also browse other M-KOPA alternatives we track.