M-Files Content Collaboration vs OpenText
M-Files Content Collaboration vs OpenText, compared side by side on 12 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: M-Files Content Collaboration is on 56/100 and OpenText on 9/100.
Where each one leads
M-Files Content Collaboration
- our overall score: 56/100 against 9/100
OpenText
- agent readiness: 50/100 against 45/100
- domain rating: 86/100 against 74/100
At a glance
| Measure | M-Files Content Collaboration | OpenText |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | Intelligent content management and automation platform for enterprise information. | Enterprise information management software and services provider. |
| Category | Enterprise Software, Information Management, Content Management, Workflow Automation | Enterprise Software, Information Management, Content Management, Business Process Management |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2006 | 1991 |
| Headquarters | Plano, United States | Waterloo, Canada |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | M-Files Content Collaboration | OpenText |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 839 | Not published |
| Total funding | $201M | Not published |
| Latest round | Growth Equity | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 47,811 | Not published |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | M-Files Content Collaboration | OpenText |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 56/100 | 9/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | Not published |
| Team | 30/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 23/100 | 5/100 |
| Quality | 68/100 | Not published |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (45/100) | D (50/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 86/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | M-Files Content Collaboration | OpenText |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Not detected |
| CMS | WordPress | Not detected |
| Analytics | Google Tag Manager | Not detected |
| Open source | Yes | No |
What users say
| Measure | M-Files Content Collaboration | OpenText |
|---|---|---|
| Reddit sentimentThreads we track | Not published | 0 positive, 5 negative across 6 threads |
“OpenText is the worst company I’ve worked at. I joined during COVID right after finishing my Master’s from a top university. Role: Software Developer. I worked hard, got consistently good performance reviews, and delivered solid work. But e”r/waterloo
M-Files Content Collaboration vs OpenText: common questions
Which is better, M-Files Content Collaboration or OpenText?
On our 0-100 score M-Files Content Collaboration rates higher (56/100 against 9/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 12 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do M-Files Content Collaboration and OpenText compare on the numbers?
M-Files Content Collaboration leads on our overall score (56/100 against 9/100). OpenText leads on agent readiness (50/100 against 45/100), domain rating (86/100 against 74/100).
What do real users say about M-Files Content Collaboration and OpenText?
OpenText: 0 positive and 5 negative mentions across 6 Reddit threads we track, mostly in r/waterloo.
Read the full M-Files Content Collaboration review and pricing or the OpenText review and pricing. You can also browse other M-Files Content Collaboration alternatives we track.