Lusha vs Sealed.ai
Lusha vs Sealed.ai, compared side by side on 19 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Lusha is on 70/100 and Sealed.ai on 45/100.
Where each one leads
Lusha
- our overall score: 70/100 against 45/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 22/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 2/100
- headcount: 358 against 4
- headcount growth: +3.7% against -24.9%
- funding raised: $245M against $3.0M
- LinkedIn following: 66,037 against 427
Sealed.ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Lusha | Sealed.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | B2B contact data platform for sales and marketing professionals to find and engage leads. | AI-powered platform to optimize and analyze sales calls for revenue growth. |
| Category | Enterprise, Sales, Intelligence, Contact Data Provider | Enterprise, Sales, Conversational AI, Contact Center AI |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2018 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | San Francisco, United States |
| Status | Active | Inactive |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Lusha | Sealed.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 358 | 4 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.7% | -24.9% |
| Total funding | $245M | $3.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Not published |
| Valuation | $1.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 66,037 | 427 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Lusha | Sealed.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 45/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 39/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 60/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 52/100 | 30/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 48/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (22/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 2/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Lusha | Sealed.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Hosting | Not detected | Vercel |
| CDN | Cloudflare | Vercel |
Lusha vs Sealed.ai: common questions
Which is better, Lusha or Sealed.ai?
On our 0-100 score Lusha rates higher (70/100 against 45/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 19 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Lusha and Sealed.ai compare on the numbers?
Lusha leads on our overall score (70/100 against 45/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 22/100), domain rating (74/100 against 2/100), headcount (358 against 4), headcount growth (+3.7% against -24.9%), funding raised ($245M against $3.0M), LinkedIn following (66,037 against 427).
Read the full Lusha review and pricing or the Sealed.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Lusha alternatives we track.