Lusha vs Retrain.ai
Lusha vs Retrain.ai, compared side by side on 20 data points: what each one does, how big it is, what it has raised, the tech running each site, and what users report. We score both out of 100 on traction, team and visibility: Lusha is on 70/100 and Retrain.ai on 55/100.
Where each one leads
Lusha
- our overall score: 70/100 against 55/100
- agent readiness: 47/100 against 39/100
- domain rating: 74/100 against 43/100
- headcount: 358 against 14
- headcount growth: +3.7% against -37.8%
- funding raised: $245M against $34.0M
- LinkedIn following: 66,037 against 5,850
Retrain.ai
Leads on none of the measures we hold for both companies.
At a glance
| Measure | Lusha | Retrain.ai |
|---|---|---|
| What it is | B2B contact data platform for sales and marketing professionals to find and engage leads. | Talent intelligence platform using AI and market data for enterprise hiring and workforce development. |
| Category | Enterprise, Sales, Intelligence, Contact Data Provider | Enterprise, Recruiting, Talent, Intelligence |
| Sells toBusiness model | B2B, B2C | B2B |
| Offering | Software | Software |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
| Headquarters | Boston, United States | Tel Aviv, Israel |
| Status | Active | Active |
Size, funding and growth
| Measure | Lusha | Retrain.ai |
|---|---|---|
| Employees | 358 | 14 |
| Headcount growthLast 12 months | +3.7% | -37.8% |
| Total funding | $245M | $34.0M |
| Latest round | Series B | Series B |
| Valuation | $1.5B | Not published |
| LinkedIn followers | 66,037 | 5,850 |
StartupHub scores
Our own 0-100 ratings. They measure company strength and site quality, not which product suits you.
| Measure | Lusha | Retrain.ai |
|---|---|---|
| StartupHub scoreOur 0-100 rating | 70/100 | 55/100 |
| Traction | 60/100 | 49/100 |
| Team | 70/100 | 70/100 |
| Community | 8/100 | Not published |
| Search visibility | 52/100 | 31/100 |
| Quality | 78/100 | 58/100 |
| Agent readinessHow well an AI agent can read and act on the site | D (47/100) | F (39/100) |
| Domain ratingLink authority, 0-100 | 74/100 | 43/100 |
Technology
Detected on each public site, so it reflects the marketing stack as well as the product.
| Measure | Lusha | Retrain.ai |
|---|---|---|
| CDN | Cloudflare | Cloudflare |
| CMS | Not detected | WordPress |
| Frameworks | Not detected | Jquery, Bootstrap |
| Analytics | Not detected | Google Analytics 4, Google Tag Manager, Segment, Linkedin Insight |
Lusha vs Retrain.ai: common questions
Which is better, Lusha or Retrain.ai?
On our 0-100 score Lusha rates higher (70/100 against 55/100). The score weights traction, team, visibility and profile completeness, so it reflects company strength rather than which product suits you. We compare the two on 20 data points above: read the rows that match what you are buying for.
How do Lusha and Retrain.ai compare on the numbers?
Lusha leads on our overall score (70/100 against 55/100), agent readiness (47/100 against 39/100), domain rating (74/100 against 43/100), headcount (358 against 14), headcount growth (+3.7% against -37.8%), funding raised ($245M against $34.0M), LinkedIn following (66,037 against 5,850).
Read the full Lusha review and pricing or the Retrain.ai review and pricing. You can also browse other Lusha alternatives we track.